OFMAI is an AI content creation platform built for creators. You train a custom AI character from your own reference photos, then generate unlimited consistent photos, videos and voice notes featuring that character.

How does AI character training work?

You upload reference photos. OFMAI trains a custom model that learns your face and body features. After training, you can generate content with consistent likeness across every shot.

How much does OFMAI cost?

OFMAI offers four plans: Starter ($9.99/month, 30 credits), Pro ($24.99/month, 100 credits), Business ($49.99/month, 300 credits), and Agency ($149.99/month, 1000 credits). New users get 15 free credits to try the platform.

Is OFMAI compatible with Fanvue?

Yes. OFMAI is the AI tool recommended by Fanvue. We're an official partner and our content meets their platform requirements.

Can I use OFMAI content commercially?

Yes. Content you generate with your own model belongs to you. You can post it on Fanvue, Instagram, or any platform where AI content is allowed.

What kind of content can I generate?

OFMAI generates AI photos, AI videos with curated presets, AI voice clones, and image edits. All content features your custom AI character for a consistent look across your feed.

Should I turn on 'mark media as sensitive' on X?

If any part of your content is likely to fall into that category, turn the account-level setting on before you publish anything at all, not after. X is the most permissive major platform for creator content, and it grants that permissiveness on the condition that the content is labelled and kept from people who have not opted in. The reason to do it first is that enforcement is retroactive: an account posting unlabelled borderline media for two months does not lose one post, it gets its whole history reviewed. There is also a per-post version of the same control for content you did not anticipate. Turning it on costs nothing and removes an entire category of risk permanently.

Do the sensitive-media settings cover my profile photo and header?

No, and this is the most common way an otherwise compliant creator account gets restricted. Your profile photo and header image are shown to everyone regardless of any content setting — including people who have never opted into sensitive media, and including contexts where your account is merely mentioned by someone else rather than being visited. Keep both unambiguously clean whatever else you post. The same logic applies to your display name and bio text, which appear in search results, notifications and other people's mentions, where none of your content settings apply either. Treat those four placements as a permanently public shopfront and put everything else behind the label.

Do I need to disclose that my X account is an AI character?

You should, both because X expects synthetic and manipulated media to be identified and because it is straightforwardly in your interest. The practical form is a short 'AI' or 'virtual' marker in the bio plus occasional acknowledgement in posts. X has automated detection and a community annotation system that will label your content for you if you do not, and being labelled by others reads far worse than labelling yourself. Beyond compliance, an audience that discovers a persona is synthetic on its own reacts badly and publicly, while one that knew from the start largely does not care. Policy in this area is changing quickly, so check X's current published rules rather than relying on any guide for exact obligations.

How many times a day should I post on X?

Two to three posts a day, mixing images and short clips, plus a couple of considered replies and one quote-post. Unlike the conflicting cadence advice you will see for other platforms, this range is defensible on X specifically: its feed moves fast enough that two or three posts genuinely do not compete with each other for the same audience. If you can only sustain one post a day, sustain one — consistency matters more than the number, as everywhere else. What matters more than volume is avoiding the documented platform-manipulation behaviours: duplicate or near-duplicate text, mass mentions, aggressive bulk following, and heavy hashtag use, which X treats as a spam signal more readily than Instagram does.

X (Twitter) Playbook for AI Creators

By the OFMAI Team · Updated July 2026

X is the smallest lesson in this module because X is where the least platform-specific tactical knowledge exists. The reply-and-quote loop is the same one you already know from Threads, the content-testing discipline is the same one you already know from Instagram, and the replication routes are the same ones covered in the content module. Repeating them here at length would inflate the page without teaching you anything.

What X does have that nothing else in this module has is a specific, unusual policy position. It is the most permissive major platform for the kind of content creators actually want to post — and it pays for that permissiveness with the most explicit labelling obligations. Getting the settings right at the start is most of what determines whether an X account survives. That is what this lesson covers, plus a defensible cadence and the behaviours that trip its spam defences.

Warm-up is out of scope — see Warm up a social account. So is content sourcing and replication, which the content module owns.

Get the sensitive-media settings right before your first post

X permits a category of content that Instagram, TikTok and Threads all refuse, and it does so on one condition: that the content is correctly labelled and kept away from people who have not opted in. There is an account-level setting, usually described as marking the media you post as sensitive, and there is a per-post option for the same thing. If any part of your content is likely to fall into that category, turn on the account-level setting before you publish anything at all.

The reason to do it first rather than later is that the enforcement failure mode is retroactive. An account that has been posting unlabelled borderline media for two months does not get one post removed; it gets a review of everything it has posted. Turning the setting on from day one costs nothing and removes that entire class of risk.

The two placements this does not cover are the profile photo and the header image. Those are shown to everyone regardless of any setting, including people who have not opted into sensitive media and including in contexts where your account is merely mentioned. Keep both unambiguously clean, whatever else you post. This is the single most common way an otherwise compliant creator account gets restricted.

The same principle applies to your display name and bio: keep both neutral, with no suggestive wording and no suggestive emoji. Those strings appear in search results, in notifications and in other people's mentions, where none of your content settings apply.

Disclose the AI, in the bio and occasionally in posts

X expects synthetic and manipulated media to be identified, and it has both automated detection and a community annotation system that will do it for you if you do not. For a character-driven account the practical form of compliance is straightforward: carry a short 'AI' or 'virtual' marker in the bio, and mention it occasionally in posts rather than never.

The reason to do this goes beyond compliance. An audience that discovers on its own that a persona is synthetic reacts badly and publicly; an audience that knew from the start does not care nearly as much. The disclosure costs you almost nothing in followers and removes your single largest source of reputational risk. It also makes you far harder to report successfully, because the most common complaint against accounts like this is deception rather than content.

Platform rules on synthetic media are changing faster than any other area of policy, on X and everywhere else. Read the current published rules rather than relying on a guide — including this one — for exact wording or exact obligations. What is stable is the direction of travel: disclosure requirements are getting stricter everywhere, and accounts built on non-disclosure are building on something that will be taken away.

Cadence, and the behaviours that get accounts limited

Two to three posts a day, mixing images and short clips, plus a couple of considered replies and one quote-post, is a reasonable target on X — and unlike the other platforms in this module, that range is defensible rather than contradictory, because X's feed moves fast enough that two or three posts genuinely do not crowd each other out. If you can only sustain one, sustain one. The consistency matters more than the number.

What matters more than volume is what your activity looks like to X's platform-manipulation systems, which are stricter and more aggressive than most creators expect. The specific behaviours to avoid are documented rather than rumoured: posting duplicate or near-duplicate text repeatedly, mass-mentioning accounts, aggressive bulk following and unfollowing, and coordinated reply activity across accounts. Vary your captions, vary your timing, and keep hashtags to one or two per post — heavy hashtag use is treated as a spam signal here in a way it is not on Instagram.

Replies and quote-posts are the discovery mechanism, exactly as on Threads, and the same rule applies: participate as a person under other people's posts, and promote only from your own. A thoughtful quote-post of someone in your niche is legitimate distribution. A promotional reply under a stranger's post is the behaviour that gets accounts flagged.

Add your link only once posts are getting steady engagement, and put it in the bio with a pinned post carrying the actual call to action. Link aggregators get restricted regularly, so keep an alternative ready and check yours periodically — the failure is silent and can run for weeks.

Measure the two numbers that mean anything

X's analytics are more generous than most platforms', which makes it easy to drown in metrics that do not predict anything. Two are worth watching weekly: profile clicks, and follows attributable to a post. Impressions are entertainment; those two are the funnel.

The weekly review is the same discipline as on Instagram. Look at which posts produced profile clicks disproportionate to their impressions, and note what they had in common — format, hook, wardrobe, time of day. Make more of those. Retire the formats that generate impressions without clicks, however good the impression numbers look.

A creative checklist worth keeping: a hook that lands in the first three seconds, media at full resolution rather than a compressed re-upload, minimal text burned into video, and a deliberate iteration on whatever worked last week. That is genuinely the whole of it. X does not reward complexity, and there is no hidden layer of tactics being withheld from you.

The X settings checklist

Account-level sensitive-media setting turned on before your first post, if your content warrants it
Profile photo and header image unambiguously clean — no setting protects those placements
Display name and bio kept neutral — no suggestive wording or emoji, since they appear in search and mentions
An 'AI' or 'virtual' disclosure in the bio
Dedicated email and two-factor authentication on the account
One or two hashtags per post at most
Link added only after steady engagement, with a pinned post carrying the call to action
A backup link destination ready, because aggregators get restricted without warning

Frequently asked questions

Should I turn on 'mark media as sensitive' on X?: If any part of your content is likely to fall into that category, turn the account-level setting on before you publish anything at all, not after. X is the most permissive major platform for creator content, and it grants that permissiveness on the condition that the content is labelled and kept from people who have not opted in. The reason to do it first is that enforcement is retroactive: an account posting unlabelled borderline media for two months does not lose one post, it gets its whole history reviewed. There is also a per-post version of the same control for content you did not anticipate. Turning it on costs nothing and removes an entire category of risk permanently.
Do the sensitive-media settings cover my profile photo and header?: No, and this is the most common way an otherwise compliant creator account gets restricted. Your profile photo and header image are shown to everyone regardless of any content setting — including people who have never opted into sensitive media, and including contexts where your account is merely mentioned by someone else rather than being visited. Keep both unambiguously clean whatever else you post. The same logic applies to your display name and bio text, which appear in search results, notifications and other people's mentions, where none of your content settings apply either. Treat those four placements as a permanently public shopfront and put everything else behind the label.
Do I need to disclose that my X account is an AI character?: You should, both because X expects synthetic and manipulated media to be identified and because it is straightforwardly in your interest. The practical form is a short 'AI' or 'virtual' marker in the bio plus occasional acknowledgement in posts. X has automated detection and a community annotation system that will label your content for you if you do not, and being labelled by others reads far worse than labelling yourself. Beyond compliance, an audience that discovers a persona is synthetic on its own reacts badly and publicly, while one that knew from the start largely does not care. Policy in this area is changing quickly, so check X's current published rules rather than relying on any guide for exact obligations.
How many times a day should I post on X?: Two to three posts a day, mixing images and short clips, plus a couple of considered replies and one quote-post. Unlike the conflicting cadence advice you will see for other platforms, this range is defensible on X specifically: its feed moves fast enough that two or three posts genuinely do not compete with each other for the same audience. If you can only sustain one post a day, sustain one — consistency matters more than the number, as everywhere else. What matters more than volume is avoiding the documented platform-manipulation behaviours: duplicate or near-duplicate text, mass mentions, aggressive bulk following, and heavy hashtag use, which X treats as a spam signal more readily than Instagram does.

Two or three posts a day, one identity

A sustainable X cadence needs a deep, on-brand content bank rather than a scramble each morning. Generate it from a single consistent OFMAI character — free credits to start, no card required.

Start free